Skip navigation.
Law Office of Jeffrey Solomon

Free Consultation
(954) 967-9800

3864 Sheridan St . Hollywood, FL 33021

Archive for August, 2011

Do I really have to stay in ch. 13 for 5 years?

Sunday, August 21st, 2011

Chapter 13 plans are typically from 3-5 years. In Florida, which is bound by decisions of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, a debtor who is above median income on the means test must be in a 5 year plan. In re Tennyson. 611 F. 3d 873(11th Cir. 2010). The idea under BAPCPA is that the applicable commitment period for an above median income debtor is 5 years during which time the debtor must pay his disposable income.

What if the debtor is able to pay off the chapter 13 plan early? This could not be from increased income, because the debtor would have greater disposable income and would be able to increase the chapter 13 payments. But what if a family member could make a gift, or the debtor could fund the plan from exempt funds such as an IRA?

In the past, I have obtained early payoffs with the consent of Robin Weiner, Chapter 13 Trustee for Broward and Palm Beach counties in Florida. But Tennyson has caused a concern for the trustee that a chapter 13 case should perhaps remain open for the required term because the debtor could have additional income.

A recent case from the Middle District of Florida expressly authorized the early payoff of a chapter 13 plan when a motion was filed with clear notice to the creditors. In re Smith, 449 BR 817(Bankr. M. D. FL June 6, 2011). The court examined the Tennyson case and concluded it did not prevent an early payoff.

As a Fort Lauderdale bankruptcy attorney, I recognize that the early completion of a chapter 13 bankruptcy is extremely beneficial to clients who are able to obtain an independent source of funds to complete plan payments.

Inheritances after Filing: Exemption and Chapter 13 Issues

Sunday, August 21st, 2011

South Florida bankruptcy attorneys know that if a debtor inherits property within 180 days after filing of the bankruptcy, that the property becomes property of the estate subject to administration by a chapter 7 trustee. More specifically, this means that if a person dies within 180 days after the bankruptcy is filed, and the debtor has the right to receive an inheritance including life insurance proceeds, that the property belongs to the bankruptcy estate even if the asset has not yet been received by the debtor.

A couple of recent cases raised issues of great concern for debtors and had favorable rulings. In re Cutiignola, 450 BR 445, (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. 2011) upheld the debtors’ claim that that they could assert their bankruptcy exemptions to protect inherited property even though they had no interest in the property at the time of filing the bankruptcy petition. The debtors could claim as exempt property including homestead and an IRA that became property of the estate as a result of inheritance. The court relied in part on a decision binding in the Southern District of Florida, In re Wilson, 694 F. 2d 236 (11th Cir. 1982)(refund of attorney’s fees to the debtor could be claimed as exempt).

What if a person dies more than 180 days after the bankruptcy is filed, does the property belong to the bankrutptcy estate? In a chapter 7, clearly no. And one would think that the same rule applies in a chapter 13. But an 11th Circuit case raises a serious concern for a debtor who inherits property during the term of the plan, which can be up to five years. In re Waldron, 536 F. 3d 1239, (11th Cir 2008). In Waldron, the court concluded that a post-petition uninsured motorist claim was property of the estate.

This inheritance issue was addressed in In re Walsh, 2011 Bankr Lexis 2602(Bankr. S. D. Ga. June 15, 2011) The court stressed that unlike an accident claim, there was a specific time period of 180 days for inheritances for property of the estate in Section 541. Walsh noted there were conflicting earlier opinions in the Middle District of Florida. Walsh upheld the debtor’s position against a claim by the chapter 13 trustee that the inheritance should be added to the bankruptcy estate.

Fort Lauderdale bankruptcy attorneys should remain concerned about the issue of inherited property in a chapter 13.

New Chapter 13 Jurisdictional Limit Case: In re Hannon

Sunday, August 7th, 2011

The jurisdictional limit for unsecured debt in a chapter 13 is $360,475.00. One way around this limit is to consider the debt separately of a husband and wife who file bankruptcy. Essentially, a joint filing is really two individuals filing a case that is jointly administered. So, for example, if the husband owes $200,000 and the wife owes $250,000 in separate debt, then the court does have chapter 13 jurisdiction.

However, keep in mind that when a debtor has joint debt with the spouse, then this joint debt must be considered as debt when calculating both the husband’s and wife’s debt.

On August 4, 2011, Judge Olson sitting in the Broward County division of the bankruptcy court in the Southern District of Florida, held that debtors could treat separately their debt limit to remain in chapter 13. In re Hannon, 2011 Bankr Lexis 2949, Case No. 10-45771. However, on the facts of this case, the debtor has substantial joint debt which still placed each debtor over the jurisdication limit.

This decision will be of great help to those who file a Fort Lauderdale chapter 13 bankruptcy.

IRS Form 1099-C: Is the debt actually forgiven and released?

Friday, August 5th, 2011

UPDATED August 25:
Judge Olson, at the end of an Order to Show Cause against several attorneys, in a short discussion, said that an issuance of a 1099 is not a basis to object to a Proof of Claim. Case no 10-49318(also can be seen at Case no 11-13345 JKO (DE 148) >(In re MacFArland)

The question often arises for a debtor as to the pros and cons of settling credit cards at a discount or a completing a short sale. The filing of a chapter 7 bankruptcy prior to any short sale or settlement should eliminate this problem because no debt is forgiven. Sometimes creditors on their own charge off an account and issue a 1099-c creating a taxable event for the recipient. This forgiveness of debt income is taxable, though an IRS Form 982 to show insolvency might often be used to avoid tax liability.

But does the filing of a 1099-c by the creditor mean the debt is released and that the creditor, or a debt purchasing company, can’t sue? Many would assume that the creditor cannot sue and that the issuance of the 1099 would be a defense. Similarly, could a creditor file a proof of claim in a bankrupcy after it had already issued a 1099C?

Bankruptcy courts have determined that the 1099c does not imply that the creditor has released its right to recover on the underlying debt or deficiency. In re Zilka, 407 BR 684(Bankr. W. D. Pa 2009). However, the debtor may have been forced to pay income taxes on the 1099. The creditor would then have to withdraw its 1099c reporting to IRS so that the debtor could receive a tax refund. Also see USA v Reed, 2010 U.S. Dist Lexis 96079(US D. Ct. E.D. Tenn.)