Skip navigation.
Law Office of Jeffrey Solomon

Free Consultation
(954) 967-9800

3864 Sheridan St . Hollywood, FL 33021

Archive for February, 2012

Beneficiary of Revocable Trust: Property of the Estate?

Saturday, February 25th, 2012

The Broward County Bar Association will be conducting a seminar on Bankruptcy for Estate Planners/Estate Planning for Bankruptcy Attorneys, on March 7, 2012, so I thought it would be appropriate now to make a comment about revocable trusts. Individuals often set up an inter vivos revocable trust in which their assets are transfered into a trust. The individual grantor is the trustee and maintains full control of the trust. The homestead is also placed in the trust by deed. Title to the home is now with the individual as trustee. The individual retains the beneficial interest in the trust including the homestead.

An older bankruptcy case did find that the homestead exemption was only for individuals, and since the title was held by a trustee, the property was not exempt from the claim of the bankruptcy trustee. In re Bosonetto, 271 BR 403 (Bank. M. D. FL 2001)(J. Proctor). However, this isolated case was rejected in In re Alexander, 346 BR 546(Bankr M. D. FL 2006) and In re Edwards, 356 BR 807 Bankr. M.D. FL 2006). Also see Judge Hyman’s decision in Leto v Cutro, 2007 Bankr. Lexis 3926(Bankr S . D. FL 2007)(fn 2) Judge Williamson in Alexander reviewed several state cases in Florida to reach his conclusion.

An interesting twist of this issue was faced in In re Stiffen, 405 BR 486 (D. Ct M.D. FL 2009)(Debtor was the wife of Paul Bilzerian who spawned maybe 20 cases). Here, the debtor was the beneficiary of a revocable trust, which was the 99% owner of a limited partnership, which held title to the residence. The district court distinquished the cases in which the title was held by the trustee of a revocable trust and held against the debtor.

Though this is no guarantee, the better view which seems to be accepted is that a debtor whose home has been placed in a revocable trust can still assert the homestead exemption. The fact that there has been one case to the contrary must still give some pause to a decision to file bankruptcy.

Who Gets What from Tax Refund?

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

It is that time of year again where tax refunds become central to planning the timing of banrkuptcy filings for individual chapter 7 debtors. Bankruptcy attorneys typically delay filing until the debtor receives the tax refund and legitimately spends the funds. This does not mean paying friends or relatives any money from the tax refund.

But often the client cannot or does not want to wait. The issue I would like to discuss here is when one spouse files and there is a joint tax return, what is the share of the tax refund that the debtor can retain, and what portion is subject to the claim of the chapter 7 trustee? There is conflicting case law and this issue typically leads to a settlement with the trustee, but knowledge of the possibilites can help the bankruptcy attorney with the bargaining.

A debtor can claim that the funds are held as tenants by the entireties, owned as husband and wife. This would enable the debtor to retain the entire refund. The debtor can only claim this entitlement if there are no joint debts. Judge Hyman in In re Gorny, 2008 Bankr Lexis 3726(Bankr. S.D. FL 2008) held that a tax refund could be claimed as tenants by the entireties.(and see cases cited by the court)

But I suspect Gorny would reflect a minority review as to the right to receive a refund being exempt as tenants by the entireties. In re Rice, 442 BR 140 (Bankr M.D. FL 2010), based on 11th Circuit analysis and citing numerous cases, held that the right to the refund in a joint tax return must be allocated between husband and wife based on what each would be entitled to receive.

Debtor’s counsel should compare the percent of each spouse’s income to the total income as well as the amount of tax withholding or estimated taxes paid by each. If possible the debtor can provide alternate tax returns as if filing the return separately or jointly.

The allocation method is a double edged sword. If the debtor has lower income, then the debtor would be entitled to a lower percentage of the refund subject to the trustee’s claim. If the debtor had most of the income, the trustee would be entitled to most of the refund.

A final note. I have been discussing the right to receive a refund. What if the refund has been received and not yet spent, especially if deposited into a joint bank account? The argument for tenancy by the entireties becomes stronger.(I recall a case that specifically made this point, likely one of the numerous cases cited by Rice, but I will leave that to the reader to research)

Well, another final note. In Florida the earned income credit is exempt, but don’t mix this up with the child credit.

Contact Fort Lauderdale Bankruptcy Attorney.

Defalcation of Trustee: 11th Circuit Establishes Legal Standard

Saturday, February 18th, 2012

In Re Bullock 2012 U.S. App LEXIS 2908(11th Cir. Feb 14, 2012) affirmed the judgment in an adversary complaint objecting to the dischargeability of a debt pursuant to Section 523(a)(4). Debtor who was trustee of a life insurance trust self-dealed by using the life insurance as collateral for loans. Bank later was appointed as replacement trustee and obtained a money judgment against the debtor. State court also awarded bank as collateral property the debtor had obtained from the self dealing, but Bank refused to liquidate the assets. Bullock files Chapter 7. Bank filed adversary complaint.

11th Cir reviewed substantial split between circuits as to what constitutes defalcation. The 11th Circuit In Bullock concludes “defalcation requires a known breach of a fiduciary duty, such that the conduct can be characterized as objectively reckless”. The Court also holds that uncleans hands is not an affirmative defense. The Debtor can go back to state court to attempt to force the Bank to liquidate the collateral to help satisfy the state court judgment.

This cases summarized the substantial split in the legal standard accross the country, and for those of you outside of the 11th Circuit, this case does identify the different standards. As a Fort Lauderdale bankruptcy attorney, Bullock will set the starting point for analyzing the dischargeability of a debt by a trustee or other fiduciary.

For non-attorneys, you should be aware that creditors can file objections to getting rid of your debt based on certain types of conduct set forth in the bankruptcy statute. Improper conduct as a trustee, personal representative, or other type of fiduciary or trust relationship can be a basis to deny eliminating the debt created by this conduct.